Connecticut Conservative

Friday, November 10, 2006

How Shays Got Re-Elected

Rep. Chris Shays was certainly one of the most vulnerable Republicans in Congress. He represents a liberal district, had become closely linked to the Iraq War, and was running against a woman whom he had only narrowly beaten in 2004. He has now visited Iraq a total of fourteen times, often coming back extolling the progress of Iraq. Now, with Iraq's progress stagnating and frustrated Americans calling for change, he seemed like the perfect candidate for the Democrats to beat. But they didn't.

Granted, the race was extremely tight, and Shays edged out challenger Diane Farrell with only 51% of the vote to her 48%. But he didn't lose. Rep. Nancy Johnson, representing Connecticut's Fifth District, was running for her thirteen term. If any Republican was thought to be unbeatable, it was her. But she lost, receiving only 45% of the vote. Rep. Simmons, representing Connecticut's Second District, seems to have lost a bitterly contested race to Democratic challenger Joe Courtney. Though no winner has officially been announced, Courtney is ahead by 200 votes. Of the three Republican congressman in Connecticut, Shays was thought to be the most likely to lose. What happened?

First, his challenger was far from perfect. Farrell's main issue was the Iraq War, but her own stance has been controversial. At one point, several years ago, she had supported the war. Now, she was running as staunch anti-war candidate, a switch that reeked of hypocrisy to many voters. Also, Farrell has made statements like "we have aided and abetted Al Qaida and terrorists" that outraged liberals and conservatives alike.

Rep. Shays can be considered a moderate, but Farrell is most certainly a liberal. For voters, Shays was moderate enough, "un-Republican" enough, to be re-elected. He has carved a niche in Congress as a being an independent maverick in the mold of Sen. McCain (McCain even campaigned with Shays), and voters felt that Shays was far enough from the President to deserve re-election. Maybe what Shay's re-election can tell us is that voters weren't intent on electing Democrats to Congress time term. They were focused on voting out Republicans, and Shays has been liberal to the point were he can hardly be called a Republican anymore.

11 Comments:

  • Shays muddled his stance on Iraq by even going to the left of farrell after his fourteenth trip to Iraq and the lamont primary win. His alignment with Lieberman and the support of Mike Bloomberg's organization got him re-elected. Farrell is a much brighter bulb and not anymore liberal than Shays. Shays was even to the right of Bush in immigration but now that Democrats ocntrol the House we'll get the Bush?McCain?Kennedy Plan and Shays will tell us how great it is after he votes for it. His principal principle is to blow with the wind, the political winds.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 10:27 AM  

  • Shays is a liberal Democrat. It’s no more complicated than that.

    That’s how he got elected. Liberals voted for him.

    Rell -- same thing.

    By Blogger mccommas, at 4:50 PM  

  • I think you make a good array of points. I would add 2 more

    1. Shays came off as being open to seeking a solution on Iraq, and not just reiterating the same old line of stay the course.
    2. His bipartisan(read independent) talking points drafted off of Lieberman's success.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:35 PM  

  • Who is calling Shays conservative? one has to remember comments made by Shays during famous Clinton's impeachment. Shays is liberal this is why he was reelected in liberal state like Connecticut. McCain is opportunist who is red outside but blue inside. Got it?

    By Anonymous sam oryol, at 11:52 AM  

  • Who is calling Shays conservative? one has to remember comments made by Shays during famous Clinton's impeachment. Shays is liberal this is why he was reelected in liberal state like Connecticut. McCain is opportunist who is red outside but blue inside. Got it?

    By Anonymous sam oryol, at 11:52 AM  

  • 11:35; if you are saying that Shays is a phoney blowing in the wind politician like Lieberman then I agree.

    By Anonymous anonymous 10:27, at 12:53 PM  

  • "McCain is opportunist who is red outside but blue inside."

    I wish I said that!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:13 PM  

  • McCain edging toward an '08 presidential run. Ughhh. Another open borders, pro-amnesty, stick-it-to-the-American worker elitist hack. Can't wait to hear more pious speeches on campaign finance reform too.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:27 PM  

  • Shays is a liberal.
    Of all the Republicans not to lose last Tuesday. ugh.
    All that being sad...I mean said..
    Shays lost because voter turnout in Bridgeport was pathetic.
    Apparently the Martha Stewart wannabee from Westport didn't fire up the urban hip hop crowd in big numbers.

    Hey, did anyone catch Shays' election night speech? I thought poor betsi was going to have to give Chrissy his binky and carry him off stage to find his favorite blanky.

    yikes.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:03 PM  

  • ROBOCALLS!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:20 PM  

  • Bye Rob!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:16 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home